Are coated Probiotics better?

Are coated Probiotics better?

Storage of Probiotics:

Are you worried about the necessary storage conditions for probiotics, such as selling them from a regular shelf versus selling them from a refrigerator? Or shipping them in a regular box versus in a cold box?

Endurance in the Stomach

Have you seen advertisements for probiotics that can endure the acidic conditions of the stomach?
Encapsulation is a technique that helps increase the viability of probiotic bacteria from harsh environments, such as low pH levels in the stomach, temperature, and humidity. There is a wide variety of such coating materials. The viability of probiotics depend largely on the type and concentration of such materials. However, there are not many studies readily available to evaluate which method, brand, and product are the best (1).
ENDURANCE IN THE STOMACH: Is encapsulation an answer?

Dead Probiotics are Also Effective

There are some surprising reports that even dead probiotics have beneficial effects on the host, just like how a "killed" polio virus can affect immunity (2, 3). Dead, or killed, bacteria have particular protein biomarkers in their cell membranes. The biomarkers can elicit a response in our body. Therefore, the statement that probiotics must always be alive could be wrong.

Not Worth it to Buy Coated Probiotics

Therefore, it could be a waste of money to buy expensive, coated probiotics. Instead, t is more important to concentrate on the probiotic strains.


  1. Corona-Hernandez, R. I., Álvarez-Parrilla, E., Lizardi-Mendoza, J., Islas-Rubio, A. R., de la Rosa, Laura. A. and Wall-Medrano, A. (2013), Structural Stability and Viability of Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria: A Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 12: 614–628.
  2. Clifford A. Adams. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 June; 23(1): 37–46
  3. Jasmeet Kataria, Nan Li, James L. Wynn, Josef Neu. Probiotic microbes: do they need to be alive to be beneficial? Nutr Rev. 2009 September; 67(9): 546–550